EXPERTS vs "EXPERTS"
Matthew Levine: 11/28/21
Truthfulness is the foundation of all the virtues of mankind. Without truthfulness, progress and success in all of the worlds are impossible for a soul. When this holy attribute is established in man, all the other divine qualities will also become realized. Let the light of truth and honesty shine from your faces so that all may know that your word, in business or pleasure, is a word to trust and be sure of. Forget self and work for the whole. (Message to the London Baha'is, October 1911).
—Baha'u'llah and the New Era, Pages 85-86: gr5
At the same time that the lockdowns began 20 months ago due to a virus with a mortality rate no worse than the seasonal flu, complete media censorship was implemented to obliterate the freedom of speech of those who had a different opinion from the government and big pharma. American citizens were enjoined to listen to the experts. But only one side of the medical equation was presented. Thousands of highly trained professionals including Nobel Prize-winners in related medical fields from all over the world had different opinions from what was shoveled 24/7 into our consciousness, peripheral or otherwise. These voices were silenced. So when experts in the same fields have opposing opinions, who does one listen to?
The interesting thing about experts is that there is no consensus of what determines if one is a true expert nor is there any way of measuring one’s degree of expertise.
Traditionally, experts have been thought of as those who have graduated from college in their chosen field, have put in years of practice, and have demonstrated to a degree that they know what they’re doing. In a perfect, moral world this might be a measure of assessing whether someone is an expert but when we consider the fact that almost every area of endeavor—from education, finance, medicine, and ecology, to religion and philosophy—has been corrupted by “experts,” it’s no wonder that there is no consensus. Our world, in fact, has all been but destroyed by “experts” who have battled against the real experts who are trying to make a positive change in the world’s affairs. The media throws around the term expert generously without differentiating which does harm and which does good. If they are called an expert, we are expected to listen. Why do we listen?
In 1992, three time New York teacher of the year John Taylor Gatto wrote in his seminal work, Dumbing Us Down:
For 140 years this nation has tried to impose objectives downward from a lofty command center made up of “experts,” a central line of social engineers. It hasn’t worked. It won’t work. And it is a gross betrayal of the democratic process that once made this nation a noble experiment.
And again:
Experts in education have never been right; their “solutions” are expensive and self-serving and always involve further centralization. We’ve seen the results.
So it appears that since grade school we have been conditioned to be subservient to authority. Gatto writes:
No common school that actually dared to teach the use of critical thinking tools—like the dialectic, the heuristic, or other devices that free minds should employ—would last very long before being torn to pieces. In our secular society, school has become the replacement for church, and like church it requires that its teachings must be taken on faith.
Apparently, Americans (and other countries that use a similar educational system) are “educated” (read: indoctrinated) from elementary through graduate schools to place undue trust in authority figures (experts) regardless of whether they have earned anybody’s trust.
So what experts are trustworthy? How do I know which is correct?
Knowledge is a moving target and even well-intentioned experts can occasionally miss the mark. Trustworthiness is not always a matter of who has the most knowledge, though, but who thinks independently and has altruistic motives. This requires one to be open to new knowledge, have the best intentions for those they serve, and be willing to make changes to their knowledge base when required. Then they are more likely to earn others’ trust.
Bahá’u’lláh writes:
Trustworthiness is the greatest portal leading unto the tranquillity and security of the people. In truth the stability of every affair hath depended and doth depend upon it. All the domains of power, of grandeur and of wealth are illumined by its light. — Tablets of Bahá’u’lláh Revealed After the Kitab-i-Aqdas, Pages 33-44: gr17
Unfortunately, many so called experts have been corrupted by bribes, threats, or the want of money and power. They are often good actors indistinguishable from ethical ones. Since 2020, we have seen many of these “experts” in the medical field give out advice and information only to find out that they were misleading the public. They know that most people are busy, preoccupied, and won’t do the research to get to the truth. So they lie because, in some way, they profit from it.
Let’s take a look at one example (warning: this is a moderate dive. Grab a cup of tea or something):
Dr. Fauci, Biden’s chief medical advisor, has been promoting the Covid vaccines to everybody since 2020. He says the vaccinated are safer than the unvaccinated and sidesteps any talk about the naturally immune (those who contracted COVID and survived). On CNN’s State of the Union, Fauci told host Jake Tapper that COVID-19 is now an “outbreak among the unvaccinated.” Since Fauci occupies a position of authority, people listen, but what proof has he given the people? None—not one scientific study. But there are plenty of studies that disprove his thesis.
First, let’s look at vaccines in general.
On December 4th, 2020, Dr. Kelly Brogan posted a groundbreaking study by Dr. Paul Thomas and James Lyons-Weiler, PhD comparing 3,324 pediatric patients who were either vaccinated or unvaccinated. These children were studied for ten years. They measured Relative Incidence of Office Visits, Incidence of Disease, Diagnosed Infections Targeted by Vaccines, Cumulative Office Visit Risk, and other parameters. In each case, the vaccinated patients did significantly worse. The researchers concluded:
“that the vaccinated children were sicker and experiencing more suffering from infectious, autoimmune and neurodevelopmental disorders than the unvaccinated children.”
Dr. Thomas, had his license revoked for months because he published a book detailing the above study showing clearly that the vaccinated children in his practice of 10,000 had WAY more office visits and suffered FAR more from all manner of issues. His book is called The Vaccine Friendly Plan. His weekly show is called Against the Wind and can be seen at: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/against-the-wind-with-dr-paul-thomas
Now let’s look at the goal of both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated: herd immunity.
On February 14, 2021, in the publication The Vaccine Reaction, Jeffrey A. Tucker writes:
Herd immunity speaks directly, and with explanatory power, to the empirical observation that respiratory viruses are either widespread and mostly mild (common cold) or very severe and short-lived (SARS-CoV-1).
Why is this? The reason is that when a virus kills its host—that is, when a virus overtaxes the body’s ability to integrate it, its host dies and so the virus does not spread to others. The more this occurs, the less it spreads. If the virus doesn’t kill its host, it can hop to others through all the usual means. When you get a virus and fight it off, your immune system encodes that information in a way that builds immunity to it. When it happens to enough people,… the virus loses its pandemic quality and becomes endemic, which is to say predictable and manageable. Each new generation incorporates that information through more exposure.
This is what one would call Virology/Immunology 101. It’s what you read in every textbook. It’s been taught in 9th grade cell biology for probably 80 years. Observing the operations of this evolutionary phenomenon is pretty wonderful because it increases one’s respect for the way in which human biology has adapted to the presence of pathogens without absolutely freaking out.
Here is how the WHO defined herd immunity in early 2020:
Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. —https://web.archive.org/web/20201105013101/https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19-serology
Unfortunately, Dr. Fauci, the W.H.O. and all players profiting from the vaccines don’t want you to know this. So, since March 2020 when the “pandemic” broke out, they have redefined key terms to fit their political purposes: Vaccines, cases, pandemic, fully vaccinated, and herd immunity are just a few.
On the same WHO website above, here’s how they changed the definition of herd immunity in late 2020:
‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.
Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.—https://web.archive.org/web/20201124094747/https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19-serology
In the same article by Jeffrey A Tucker, he writes:
…the World Health Organization…has suddenly decided to delete everything I just wrote from cell biology basics. It has literally changed the science in a Soviet-like way. It has removed with the delete key any mention of natural immunities from its website. It has taken the additional step of actually mischaracterizing the structure and functioning of vaccines.
Interestingly, though the CDC has continuously blamed the unvaccinated for the spread of Covid-19 or other variants, they have no studies to support this nor do they have a record of a single unvaccinated person spreading SARS-CoV-2 (the infection)!!! Here’s proof! This is the top half of the letter dated Nov. 5, 2021 from the CDC admitting they have no such record:
When it comes down to it, “the proof is in the pudding.” If I listed all the lies that this “expert” has perpetrated on the American people (and hence the people of the world), this would be a very thick book. Speaking of which, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has a #1 bestseller on Amazon called The Real Anthony Fauci. If you want to get more details on this charlaton, you now can order it here: https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Childrens/dp/1510766804/ref=zg_bs_books_1?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=AZHSDA83A2KQA5E8DCAW
Now let’s listen to Dr. Peter McCullough, said to be the most published cardiologist in the world. He is also a professor, medical journal editor, author of 600+ publications, and senior author of the largest COVID-19 treatment review. This is the first paragraph from his article/podcast, COVID-19 Vaccine Induced Disease Emerges as Leading Public Health Threat published November 16. 2021:
The revelation that with each injection of COVID-19 genetic vaccines that spike protein is loaded into the human body and accumulates to an even higher level, causing inflammation and organ injury in the brain, heart, immune system, and bone marrow are stunning from a clinical perspective. As the viral pandemic ebbs, we can expect to learn and hear more about how the COVID-19 vaccines, which are now administered by mandate and in some countries by force, grow in strength as the leading public health threat and, instead of preventing disease, become significant determinants of a whole new class of illnesses leading to disability, hospitalization, and death. —https://www.americaoutloud.com/covid-19-vaccine-induce-disease-emerges-as-leading-public-health-threat/
In other places he goes on to say that the spike protein in SARS-CoV-1 is the exact same spike protein that the Covid vaccines cause the body to manufacture which do so much damage.
Dr. Peter McCullough is not alone; Dr. Scott Atlas, an original advisor to the President’s White House Coronavirus Task Force who believes in natural immunity had the unique opportunity to debate the situation with Birx, Redfield, Fauci and others. These so called experts were NOT practicing doctors and hadn't seen patients in years, while thousands of doctors in the trenches were doing what doctors have done for decades—looking for successful treatments that were off label—and THEY were one who were censored. These were people that influenced pandemic policy that affected not only America but the entire world. If only we could know what went on in these secret meetings. Here are some excerpts from what Dr. Atlas had to say about his experiences in the task force when interviewed by Tucker Carlson on Nov. 17, 2021:
I’m listening to these people talk and I was stunned. I was stunned at the lack of knowledge, at the complete lack of knowing the data, at the lack of critical thinking…I was the only one who had scientific papers in the task force meeting.…no one there—none of these medical people offered any data to rebut it. None of them. Not one…They would just say, I’m an outlier. They were a unit—Birx, Fauci, and Redfield. In fact, Dr. Birx said in, say, January, February of this year that—I didn’t know this at the time—she had an unwritten sort of contract agreement with Fauci and Redfield—that if one of them got fired, they would all fire. They were in it together. And their history stems from HIV and AIDS. And I briefly mentioned this in the book [A Plague Upon Our House]. They worked together on AIDS. They worked together—with one focus by the way—to get a vaccine, which should ring a bell with what’s happening.
…I wasn’t there to make friends, and I didn’t have any media friends there. I was there for one reason, to stop people from dying.
…I don’t think Dr. Fauci really has seen a patient in decades. I’d be shocked if he’s seen a patient in 30, 40 years…
…there were medical words being mispronounced in the meetings. There were statements being made that were just—I was looking around and sort of saying, did anyone else hear this but me?
…I’ve never worked with people at this level in my career as I did in that task force. And I’m not saying at a high level. OK, I’m saying at a low level.
…I’m not sure anybody understood what was going on in the task force…there was a massive and successful campaign to intimidate people. Tucker, I got hundreds of emails a day, 95% supporting me, thousands a week, but I also got hundreds of emails from scientists all over the world, in the United States, and even at Stanford saying, Scott, you’re right. Keep talking. We’re afraid to come forward because there is a very intimidating and very successful effort to smear people, to censure people for speaking against the conventional narrative. And this is–in my world, I had never heard of this in science…we will never arrive at the truths we need if science is not the exchange of ideas. (full interview: https://youtu.be/k96jJ7mo4FQ)
The point of this whole exposé is that a real scientist—a real expert of any kind—isn’t of value just because they know stuff; they take pride in their vocation. Their motives are pure for they value their credibility as well as those they administer to. And they don't accept money from big pharma to promote experimental vaccines. Seek these experts out and you will be better for it.
